Search

Modeling additive manufacturing processes can be difficult due to the scale difference between the active processing point (e.g., a sub-millimeter melt pool) and the part itself. Typically, the tools used to model these processes are either too computationally intensive (due to high physical fidelity or inefficient computations) or are focused solely on either the microscale (e.g., microstructure) or macroscale (e.g., cracks). These pitfalls make the tools unsuitable for fast and efficient evaluations of additive manufacturing build files and parts. Failures in parts made by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) often come when there is a lack of fusion or overheating of the metal powder that causes areas of high porosity. AM-PM uses a point field-based method to model L-PBF process conditions from either the build instructions (pre-build) or in situ measurements (during the build). The AM-PM modeling technique has been tested in several builds including a Ti-6Al-4V test article that was divided into 16 parts, each with different build conditions. With AM-PM, calculations are performed faster than similar methods and the technique can be generalized to other additive manufacturing processes. The AM-PM method is at technology readiness level (TRL) 6 (system/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment) and is available for patent licensing.

Working with EOS, a market leader in additive manufacturing (AM) technology, NASA has pioneered the use of AM to achieve improved performance and cost reduction of propulsion catalyst systems. As mentioned above, conventional mono-propulsion catalysts are comprised of ceramic or graphite foams, which possess thousands of irregular pores with non-uniform size and distribution. Due to the lack of granular control in the manufacturing process, such foams are limited in terms of feasible designs. These foams also exhibit anisotropic mechanical properties and inconsistent fluid flow behavior. Furthermore, such catalysts are produced by a limited number of vendors, constraining availability and inflating cost. As with several other aerospace structures, AM of mono-propulsion catalysts enables increased manufacturing capabilities (e.g., granular geometric control, repeatability) while reducing cost and lead time. NASA and EOS leveraged AM to generate ultra-fine lattice structures repeating unit cells with ligament thickness as small as 100 microns to replace coated ceramic or graphite foam catalysts. These AM lattice structures offer several advantages including increased control of structure topology, unconstrained designed flexibility, improved compressive strength, and fluid flow optimization all printed into a single component from a preferred refractory platinum metal. Granular control of structure topology allows for tailored percent relative density (%RD), which in turn allows manufacturers to control the mechanical and fluid flow properties of the final catalyst structure. In other words, NASAs AM ultra-fine lattice catalyst structures significantly improve upon the drawbacks of conventional catalysts by offering a higher degree of control over the structure, enabling the generation of catalysts with customized material properties. In addition, the use of AM ensures the catalysts exhibit high spatial symmetry and can be generated in a repeatable (non-stochastic) manner, all while reducing cost and lead times. While NASA and EOS' ultra-fine lattice structures were originally developed for mono-propellant systems (e.g., green propellant thruster catalysts), the same structures and manufacturing technologies can be applied to liquid or gas permeable rigid materials, evaporative film cooling heat exchangers, filtering, and other applications.